Having to Win: The Combative Thinking of the Disturbed Character

This post continues a series on the distorted thinking patterns displayed by disordered or disturbed characters.  Earlier posts have dealt with the distubed character’s penchants for thinking in distorted ways (see: What Were They Thinking – Pt. 2), thinking of others as objects to possess and control (see: The Possessive Thinking of the Disturbed Character), thinking of themselves to the exclusion of others (see: Egocentric Thinking) and paying attention to only what they want (see: The Innatentive Thinking of the Disturbed Character).

Disordered characters, most especially the aggressive personalities, also tend to view the world as a combat stage. They see most situations as a contest that they have to win. They expend a lot of mental energy thinking about the battles they want to wage and stances they want to take against the demands of the world. Right from the first minute they think someone is asking something from them, they start planning how they will resist acceding to those expectations. They do battle so readily because they detest the idea of backing down, conceding, or giving ground, even when it would be in their long-term best interest to do so.

Habitual combative thinking is what primarily leads to the unnecessarily hostile, confrontational, and defiant attitudes that underlie antisocial conduct. The undisciplined, destructive fighters among us are who they are because of how they think about life and the world around them. Determined to win at all costs, and finding no value in concession, they end up resisting the many efforts of their parents, other authority figures, and society to socialize (i.e., civilize) them.

One of the ways I advise people to deal with this combative mindset is to be constantly on the lookout for win-win scenarios. Because they see life as a contest and they always have winning on their minds, finding a way to give diturbed characters some of what they want as a fair exchange for securing something you want can be a helpful strategy and makes living or dealing with them a lot easier. It should be said, however, that no aggressive personality has ever matured into a more pro-social being until they have dealt directly with their abhorance of submission of any kind and overcome their penchant for thinking too combatively.  At some point they have to accede to the notion that winning in the long-run sometimes means conceding or giving ground in the short run.  Because to internalize one of society’s prohibitions is necessarily an act of submission, they have to learn to be more at peace with the notion that caving-in sometimes is not the end of the world.

Be Sociable, Share!

11 thoughts on “Having to Win: The Combative Thinking of the Disturbed Character

  1. Dr. Simon, I have been married for 30 years to my husband who is now 58 years old. For all our lives together he has fit this description of “combative.” I had never heard of this disorder which astounds me because I’ve studied many disorders with a fine tooth comb. This is because I have myself been bi-polar since I was 21. I have been determined to manage my disorder rather then it managing me. My medications as needed and treatment have helped me to live a nearly normal life. My husband tells people that my bi-polar has been the least of problems we’ve seen through. I work in security (which requires yearly background checks) and have no drug or alcohol problems, which my Dr.s tell me is remarkable for a bi-polar person. I am hooked on coffee and cigarettes however. All these years I expected our lives would be more difficult because of my disorder. But my husband’s abusive behavior and vicious mouth have been far more traumatizing to our family (we have 5 children). I wasn’t a spanker, using more the PET parenting style, while my husband was raised in a family where what parents call discipline is more akin to abuse. I am desperate for help as he retired 2 yr.s ago and his behavior seems to be growing worse with age. A family thearpist recommended I attend Women in Abusive relationships support groups but I couldn’t. I could only work third shift because of his temper with the children, and I did manage over the years to protect them physically, although he came right to the line with them, being feircily intimdating. I did have to call the state police once but getting arrested or losing his job would make him relent only marginally.

    What can I do? He has given me permission at the VA to discuss his medical issues. Should I call them? Thank you for this service you provide.

    1. Rosemarie,

      If you’ll permit me, however, I’d like to respond to some of the points you elude to that relate to principles I advocate in my books and other writings:

      “Combative thinking” is a type of thought process whereby a person sees too many life situations as “contests” that have to be won. A combative thinker does not allow themselves the benefit of knowing when it’s in their interest as well as everyone else’s to back down or give ground. This kind of thinking is common to aggressive personalities.

      My article and my classification of these problems do not define a particular “disorder,” which is probably why you’ve never heard of such a thing. Still, I find the framework I advance helpful in understanding what makes certain personalities behave and think as they do.

      Therapists who have solid training in personality or character disturbance and who adopt a cognitive-behavioral approach to treatment (especially if they use cognitive-behavioral strategies of anger management and aggression replacement) offer you the best hope of dealing effectively with such problems. And, naturally, the motivation for change must come from the person who has the problems. But if you do your homework, you’re likely to find someone with the expertise to help you out. More and more therapists have become familiar with my work and perspective. Some have even been given my books by their clients. But in any case, locating someone with the kind of expertise I outlined above should prove to be of help.

      Thanks for taking the time to write. I hope you secure the help you seek. Perhaps other readers will have some helpful comments as well.

      1. The long and short of my post is this: You’re wrong about us having to win, that situations are contests we have to win. It’s about not coming up short, not losing, not being ignored, trampled, abused, taken advantage of or forgotten. Not winning. Winning is just a natural solution to the fear hidden inside, but it is not the goal, refusing to be a victim any longer is our goal.

        I am one of those combative people. I’ve struggled with it a long time and I’ve found ways to as you’ve mentioned, ‘Find those middle grounds’ where both can win. I seek them out in social situations to position myself so that I can ‘win’ and others can win too, creating a equal, friendly situation for all things.

        I’ve learned to compromise and doing that is probably the most important skill I’ve developed with this. And here’s the part where I guess I come off ‘combative’. Your whole take on this is a bit off, it has very little to do with winning. It’s more about not losing, not being a doormat, not getting ran over by life, because we feel like that happens to us constantly. We have flaws, but your identification of them is off by a bit, the motivation behind the negative behavior is misunderstood here in this article.

        It’s not about winning, it’s about not losing, because we’ve lost our whole lives we feel like(Wether true or not). A lot of this for me personally deals with abuse as a child and struggles growing up with Academia despite my apparent high ‘aptitude’ according to others. I’m so used to ‘coming up short’, losing, or being trampled by my life that yes, I’ve become combative. I refuse to give up a fight easily and the depiction really fits myself and many others well, but you’re really demonizing people that are suffering with the way you’re misunderstanding the motivation.

        Please re-evaluate your thinking.
        Best Regards,

        1. Thank you “Combative Use” for your self analogy of this behavior. I’m dealing with a spouse with those attributes and proclivities and it’s driving me crazy. I totally agree because I can see those experiences in my husband. The only thing I’m confused about though is you telling Dr. Simon that it’s not about winning but it’s about not losing. Now isn’t that the same thing? Of course, no one wants to lose at anything not even living life the way we’re intended to but I believe that the combative personality takes the “not losing” to the extreme which causes the behavior to become magnified. I’m just saying. Thanks though for sharing your introspective. You’ve confirmed some things I already knew.

  2. haha I actually find myself relating to most of those traits and take them all as a complement and a further step in winning the future to an America that wont back down at any cost! I don’t think I possess anyone but I sure do think its all right to feel somewhat possessive of whats rightfully yours at present. Thank you for your endorsement!

    1. There are clearly times when one has to be willing to go to the mat, especially for an important principle. But I make it clear there’s a big distinction between tenacious assertiveness and maladaptive combativeness, and it’s the latter this article references.

  3. I know somebody who, I think, has a combative personality disorder, except they don’t have to mearly “win” they need to completely annihilate tenfold their perceived adversary. And can never ever say one nice thing about anybody, except their dog.

    1. huh. sometimes this person would rather die in a burning house than loose a war and admit they need help.
      with much respect to dr. simon i advocate a hardline stance and extreme un coperativeness to socially disturnbed. i aint their mother.

  4. Just a thought on loss-loss scenario of murder-suicide.

    I remember reading in “In Sheep’s Clothing” that in extreme cases a character disturbed person so abhor loss-win scenario that it sometime results in loss-loss case of murder-suicide.

    If we separate out the two act, we see different picture. Facing a loss (especially loss-win) situation, a character disturbed aggressive person impulsively goes only for “win-loss”. Once deed is done, and then picture of societal system of police & justice kicks in, causing easy way out of “loss-loss”. Guaranteed an amnesty scheme, we will see a serious drop in murder-suicide.

    Sad & disturbing but potentially true. Or, am I simply depressed. 🙁

    1. Andy,
      I have a difficult time finding and getting into parts of the archives.
      A murder/suicide for the CD might well be justified in their twisted brains to be a Win-Win. If they can’t enjoy or fear they have lost everything they might as well take you along. Therefore, a thought of suicide for them would be a
      win- win if you accompanied them.

      Never, ever, underestimate their sick twisted minds. You see it as a loss -loss, to them it is the opposite.

      1. Andy and BYOV
        I read that article and found it highly disturbing and worrisome, wondering if the Jerk would reach that level of dysfunction and take me out with him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *